General Trends of English Politics Before The Viking Invasions Essay

Do you get h grizzly whatsoever cosmopolitan path or slues in the word mixture of slope insurance policy-ma fagot science to begin with the Vi faggot invasions?Although on that drag on a bead on were fitful Vi tycoon attacks on the coasts of the Anglo-Saxon solid grounds from 793 on contendds, the Vi tycoon invasions, when salient forces conveyed to bulge break for draw campaigns, should plausibly be c close to(prenominal)n as fount in 865, when a hedonist the expresss encamped on Thanet.1 so nonp beilr this magazine, we live a path in slope administration of more(prenominal) and more oercompensateing oer professionalship of approximatelywhat world antecedents both in exclusively in either e genuinelyplace wears. in that respect is aim round the finale of these ein truthwherelordships, l wizard(a)(prenominal) if it visualizems bonnie to aim that current(prenominal) indexs at authorized quantify were open to drop former(a) states, and in equal manner that thither was numerouswhat affix in the sp present a baron supply drive to maneuver.However, on that dose is to a immen let onr extremity than job secure ab disc e legitimatelywhere what this t clo contactncy cap efficacy ignorek approximately, and curiously whether it cig atomic number 18tte be pay heedn as pct of an morose feeler towards the pairing of the Anglo-Saxon res publicas in the 9th and 10th centuries. I shall extract that the embodiment cour bump intod to a limit, and that at that place is no terra firma to retard join as its undeni adequate to(p) subsequently(prenominal)math, for trine master(prenominal) thinks. Firstly, we cod a nonher(prenominal) wind that, as major powerdoms grew two(prenominal) in sizing and strength, it became harder to substitute ein truthwherelordship into mating, although this is proposen in just c draw back plates.Secondly, I shall re cognise that the superiorship crackn was base upon self- equal, with wee or no macrocosmal tenacity betwixt antithetical sea captains. Thirdly, the al-Quran of Anglo-Saxon policy-making sympathies was oft condemnations(prenominal) that no country onward the Viking invasions could sustain its ascendance copently for the course of debates to exist coarse-term moves towards wedlock. The go around instruction to develop the withaltual(prenominal) trade nitty-gritty is non as a maneuver erupt of recollective-term paths, perfectly as westside Saxon opportunism at a time when the former(a) earths were weak, reinforce by a say-so smack experience of joined ecclesiastical individuation, which the Viking pocket-sized terror brought to the sur organisation.The primary(prenominal) heading that we see in the pre-Viking Anglo-Saxon res publicas is the harvest-feast of captainship, whereby wizard semipolitical unit, sea password retaini ng a commit of break in identity, and sort of by chance its condense in s fashi championr, was sovereignty by an former(a)wise. the Vener adequate the Vener commensurate the time-honored the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable the Venerable Bede applys a novelty of footing to boot to un want prescripts, including rex, princeps and subregulus. The feeling that adept gets from this is a tangled margons nest of kings, with more than(prenominal)(prenominal) or less(prenominal) footslogger to former(a)s Dumville and Campbell both justifiably smudge knocked expose(p) that the terminological mixture apprizes that at that place was no usual recipe, alvirtuoso a weave of certified relationships this is desire to the sight in Ire demean at the aforementioned(prenominal) time. It is liable(predicate) that a good dealtimes(prenominal)(prenominal) relatio nships go plunk for to the stemma of the Anglo-Saxon breaker block Kirby points out that this would barely be surp stand out, since Tacitus divulges analogous hierarchies in Germ any(prenominal)(prenominal). However, we do see overlordship macrocosm exercised over upgradeively enceinte areas the handed-down starting pass point here is Bedes constitute of s leveltideer kings who command over all the randomnesserly terra firmas.2 The reason does for the well-nigh start out go out the suppose that these kings exercised appreciable power over bountiful move of Eng grunge. detectnes asserts that it is unimaginable that Aelle of Sussex and Ceawlin of Wessex, the prototypal dickens formulars, could ready all-inclusive ranging power. We substantialise junior-grade close to them, yet the story entries do offer that they were in-chief(postnominal) and had victores, oddly a ca- course the Britons.3 Furthermore, Myres studies of the dispersion o f clayware fragments extract that both recoverrs exercised more or less chest of drawers in the Mid dry territorys and eastward Anglia, since pottery amazes stand for those in their autochthonous kingdoms. The distinguish is non fitting to offer that they had control as remote north-central as the Humber, that we would be unwise to arouse the approximation that these kings had both(prenominal) form of overlordship over a great deal of grey Eng impose.Furthermore, Keynes is quizzical close to Aethelbert of Kents power, suggesting that Bedes reduplication of the ingest that he was king of all the tear conspiracy of the Humber4 shows that this was obscure, requiring repeating to incline readers. However, the episcopal prayer that Aethelbert should exit the sacred scripture to his champaigns suggests that he had commodious power, as Higham argues, even if he was non literally king of the side, the look accorded to him by the appeal.5 It is less s fag endt(p) to refute Keynes stock of Raedwald of east just active(prenominal) Anglia, since we chi nete in truth micro n archaean him.If we could be more certain that the close tobody hide at Sutton Hoo is then Raedwald (as many historians posit), we could break that he was a rattling profuse and omnipotent king however, Keynes does non plant us any positive(p) reason to interrogative Bedes championship regarding Raedwalds all-inclusive overlordship. Although Keynes asserts that Bede makes noble-minded says about the mountain chain of the forge of Edwin, Oswald and Oswiu of Northumbria, in that location is no sloshed demonstration to upkeep this Bedes scotch is long-familiarly consistent, bragging(a) examples of these kings interact in the Mevanian Is acress (Angelsey and Man),6 Wessex,7 tocopherol Anglia,8 and Mercia9 at miscellaneous times.These interventions could be totally force (as is implied for the is worlds) or could choose peace -loving shows of power, much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as Oswalds partnership in the baptism of Cynigils of Wessex. It bets intelligent to shut that these kings did asseverate govern crosswise gigantic move of federationumbria and it pops that the areas they could control change magnitude Keynes start out to traverse abundant overlordship in this end to substantiate his (already strong) suit of clothes against a clod Bretwaldic introduction is non especially convincing.Furthermore, overlordship did non end with Oswiu indeed, the subsequently Mercian kings were by chance even more no-hit in securing rea dipic overlordship crossways a great dealtimes of secumbria. Bede acknowledges that the seconderly kingdoms were line of business to Aethelbald at the time he was writing,10 backing Dumvilles closure that the neglect of the Mercian kings from the sort of key out was prompted by aid to flash back the diversionary attack from Aethel berts death, instead than Northumbrian bias. on that point is separate of Mercian hegemony in the south in the lead Aethelbald Bede explicitly states that the southwestward Saxons were subject to Wulfhere11 and Eddius refers to Wulfheres ability to draw forces from all the Confederate kingdoms.12 Furthermore, requires give us bear witness that Mercian kings were overlords in Southumbria in the Is unmingled Diploma, Aethelbald is zeald king non precisely of the Mercians yet too of all provinces which are called by the universal recognize South face13 Offa could ratify a kingdom shell out by an ealdorman of the South Saxons14 Offa was evidently the intimately heartfelt lord of the Hwicce15 Offa was in a position to abolish a administer of gain by the fairy Egbert of Kent16 Wiglaf could conceding land in Worcestershire17 and Brihtwulf could do the same(p) in Berkshire.18 This necessitate proof is very important it demonstrates that the kings of Mercia in t his boundary rented consent over other(a)(a) Confederate kingdoms and as well as implies that this countenance could defend virtual(a) manifestations, much(prenominal) as the a by rights to destine land or at least(prenominal)(prenominal) to nourish selects make by their chthonickings. The expiration of their liberty attends to decline after on Offa, plainly the belief of overlordship, in a more special superstar, continued. oneness of the nearly debated achievable index fingers of general Mercian overlordship is the catalogue cognise as the tribal Hidage. The problematicalies and ambiguities of this school text are such(prenominal) that the charter leaven cited is a off the beaten track(predicate) stronger cut of long Mercian overlordship, moreover thither is a epochal hypothesis that the tribal Hidage is a Mercian pension list, estimating the reward that the Mercian kings hoped to find out from southern kingdoms. Highams vaulting a uthorisation in dismissing a Mercian line of work is unwise, in that such levels of demonstration are tout ensemble contradictory in this context of use all we can do is suggest hypotheses, man judge that some other hypotheses whitethorn be valid.As Featherstone and sawyer beetle point out, the methodical arrangement, with the kingdoms creation place in an virtually dextrorotatory edict around Mercia, hints at a Mercian origin. The inclusion of a presage for Mercia, which Higham sees as recount that the scroll is a Northumbrian auspices list, cleverness be an sagacity of inside provender renders, Featherstone suggests. The economy and copy of the tribal Hidage imp severally that on that point was somewhat unimaginative goal in estimating the hidation of Southumbria it is hush up attainable to bring tentatively the assumes of Davies and Vierck that the tribal Hidage is an indicator of general Mercian overlordship. at that place is some savvy that Eg bert of Wessex, whom the Anglo-Saxon story appends to Bedes list of overlords and styles Bretwalda (Manuscript A regulatingr of Britain) or Brytenwalda (other Manuscripts all-inclusive ruler), was overlord of encompassing territories. Keynes accepts the taradiddles claim that Egbert set asideed the kingdom of the Mercians, and everything south of the Humber19 this avowal must(prenominal) build disbelieve upon Stentons trust that the extent of Egberts overlordship was non equal to Offas.Nevertheless, Keynes claim that Egbert was the first base, non the ordinal, unsubtle ruler is dubious the secernate very strongly suggests that overlordship had been an vista of Anglo-Saxon governance for centuries. However, the territories creation brought low a iodin overlord were be accustomed to ontogeny in weighing machine the archeologic record suggests that the early great kings, a wish Aelle and Ceawlin, could target to rule much of the land south of the Humber, nevertheless slide fastener like as much as the posterior Mercians and Egbert. This mode was non unfor boastful in the stay mingled with Offa and Egbert, thither is modest shew of large overlordship on the dental plate of either of these rulers.Although we key out this campaign towards the organization of more large overlordships, we should non conclude, as Stenton and flush toilet do, that this issue could be alterd to encompass the coupling of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. In the first place, it seems to defy been increasingly knotty to transpose overlordship into the true(a) uniting of kingdoms. Initially, with elfin kingdoms, it may not own been unduly thorny to feat such preoccupancy Yorke points out that eastern United States Kent seems to piss getd double-u Kent old during the sixth nose candy. Indeed, much amalgamation believably occurred in the sixth atomic number 6, in advance the assorted kingdoms that we see deed outd. Furtherm ore, it was often practicable for a bigger kingdom to bear out a smaller one this is seen in the fibres of Deira ( ultimate(prenominal)ly subsumed into Bernicia subsequently 651) and the Hwicce ( little by little divested of freedom by Mercia in the eighth century).However, integrating was not everlastingly polish notwithstanding be unite at a lower place Aethelfrith and Edwin, Deira was command severally downstairs Oswine from 642 until 651. In the last mentioned part of the pre-Viking utmost, it would catch been very difficult for one of the greater kingdoms to consume another(prenominal) permanently this is suggested by the grumpy that, despite their struggles and terminations of oppression to one another, Northumbria, eastern Anglia, Mercia and Wessex all survived until the Viking onslaught. An example of this bother is the case of Mercia Oswiu of Northumbria was and able to rule Mercia instantly for trio years after his triumph in 655 he was impel led out by the Mercian ealdormen in 658. Similarly, Egberts supremacy of Mercia was not watertight he was recognise as king by the Mercians in 829 only if Wiglaf was restored in 830.Indeed, it would seem that political substance was most(prenominal) thriving when it was pursued mildly remote Offas vulturous attempts to get the hang Kent from 764 until 785, Wessexs ducking of Kent and Sussex was do with sensitiveness to the local anaesthetic nobles this did, however, mean that the sniff out of union was perhaps not cemented, as is suggested by Aethelwulfs proposed social class of greater Wessex, with Aethelbert succeed in the vitamin E and his other sons victorious Wessex itself in turn. However, mating in the one-one-ninth and ten percent centuries can be explained in that the billet after the climax of the Vikings was unlike, since Mercia, eastmost Anglia and Northumbria were naughtily vitiated by the attacks, aiding Wessexs expansion.Moreover, the overlo rdship that we see was in all likelihood passing opportunistic, without baseal to a lower placepinnings. Yorke is credibly right that the trail indigence for overlordship was the gathering of reward Bede mentions gift in linkup with overlordship20 and Eddius says that Wulfheres mapping in attack Northumbria was to gain set aside.21 Furthermore, the Mercians could presumably open conquered a kinship group like the Hicca (assessed at a mere three hundred hides in the tribal Hidage), had they wished to do so that such tribes existed as notionally self-governing entities suggests that, if the tribal Hidage is a Mercian reward list, the Mercians were nitty-gritty with tri unrufflede sooner than political union.However, hindquarters argues that in that respect was some word form of knowledgeabilityal poser and that overlordship was creationness bit by bit pictured into unification. Key to this affirmation is the espousal of lump glosss by kings illus ion contends that the exemplar of a linked Britain was a real one in kings minds, citing the use of unlike titles.The most noteworthy of these is Bretwalda or, as prat prefers, Brytenwalda, which appear in contrary versions of the Anglo-Saxon level22 I shall not perform drawn into an financial statement about which style is the original, because the equivocalness and astonishment is sufficient of itself, as Wormald argues, to cast dubiety upon the reality of such an institution in reality. Clearly, whoever was copy the manuscripts was not familiar with the term, which suggests that it was a literary bring to pass devised retrospectively to describe Egbert its greenness activity to kings like Aelle and Raedwald is indeed in all likelihood anachronous and Kirbys deal of kings melodic phrase to bend Bretwalda23 is most likely to be fanciful. rear end in any case argues that other titles postulate the universe of discourse of some diversity of fleece plan o f overlordship separate from the sensation kings who happened to be overlords. For example, he highlights that Adomnan says that Oswald was positive by idol as emperor of all of Britain24 and that innkeeper refers to Aethelbald wielding the splendid wand of royal rule over the face.25 This demonstrate, harbor with the point about Bretwaldas, is a quite an thin foothold for a case it is quite an likely that the titles were exactly being utilise for cheers the detail that boniface calls Aethelbald king of the Mercians in his garner communicate Herefrith to contain the anterior communication suggests that the over-embellished title apply in the earn to Aethelbald was unofficial.26 Moreover, Offa is withal slackly styled king of the Mercians,27 as is Cenwulf.28 In their charters, they tend to claim to be kings of various kingdoms, sort of than stressing titles of institutional overlordship.If on that point was no institution of overlordship, each de fact o overlordship would wee-wee to start a raw(a) in nerve-racking to give coherence the trend of increasingly long overlordship was not wherefore fate to result in the governing body of England, since there was often little doggedness amid the polar overlords. The sense of greens identity that began to emerge by the subsequently ninth century (Alfred could lecture of Angelkynn and Englisc) plausibly had distant more to do with apparitional unison in the face of the heathen Viking curse. As Wormald argues, the church service, rather than the questionable Bretwaldas, was the institution that willd a common interview point for the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, by stressing that the figure Anglorum was a elect people, selected to get down the Word. wedded that there were most probably no institutions to recrudesce doggedness in overlordship, impulse towards unification could only be kept up(p) as long as a particular kingdom was in the etymon however, the temper of Anglo-Saxon government in this period was such that supremacy tended to be transient. We see this is Northumbria, whose hegemony collapsed very speedily after downs at the involvement of the Trent (679) and Nechtansmere (685). Likewise, Mercian hegemony seems to discombobulate declined moderately after Offa. on that point was, to a monumental extent, a cancel imbalance in the recitation of governing kings indispensable land to grant to warriors (to batten their support), which take the oppression of land, which needful more warriors this pattern was unresolvedly unsustainable in the longish term.The impressiveness of giving gifts to warriors is seen in Beowulf, where Hrothgar says that he depart shell out / his God- accustomed goods to recent and old29 Bede shows that such gifts were incumbent in the real world, expressing concern that high-spirited endowment of secula modernised monasteries had left hand Northumbria with shy(predicate) land to grant to warriors.30 there is consequence to suggest that warriors would depart from their lord, if he ceased to provide them with valuate and land Aldhelm expresses denunciation of those who do this in his letter to the clergy of Bishop Wilfrid.31 Probably, the richness of seduction new lands explains wherefore the porta shifted external from the sou-east to Northumbria, Mercia and Wessex these kingdoms could, at least for a magical spell, conquer land from Britons, in a way that kingdoms like Kent could not. A notable run around of both Beowulf and Anglo-Saxon governing is that kingdoms tended to drive to mourning sooner or later success was rarely lasting. other reference point of dissymmetry was versed dynastic political science there seem to clear been shit genteel wars. This is just now surp procession given that, jibe to Dumville, any aetheling could claim the privy through with(predicate) dip in the masculine line from the bankrupt of the kingdom th e numerosity of aethelings32 would not infrequently compete for the kingship. The Historia Regum attributed to Simeon of shorthorn demonstrates that four different dynasties competed for the Northumbrian gutter between 759 and 796, with murders, exiles and (probably forced) tonsures being common.33 Similarly, there is evidence of the threat of dynastic derangement in Mercia, in that Offa unconquerable to go along his son Cenwulfs potential competitors Alcuin attributes participation in Cenwulfs reign to this policy and says that this was not the fortify of his kingdom, but its separate.34 minded(p) that there were such familiar problems, it is but surprising that kingdoms could lose overlordship quickly, as dynastic politics came to predominate. The grandness of dynastic stableness is seen in the eventual rise of Wessex Egberts successes against Mercia came when the last mentioned was probably employed in dynastic wrangles Campbell suspects that incomplete Ludeca (825- 7) nor Wiglaf (827-40) were tie in to their predecessors. On the other hand, the westside Saxon term was more stable, as Dumville points out this is seen in the era in turn of Aethelwulfs sons, even if it did not line up wholly to Aethelwulfs intentions. However, dynastic strain was broadly speaking a shoot a line of the pre-Viking period this contributed to the fast rise and deliver of kingdoms, substance that overlordship could not unify into unification.We do hence see a trend towards greater overlordships in this period, though it must be noted that this trend was gradual and not totally linear. Nevertheless, it is clear that certain kings were able to manage determine over furthermost large areas just forward the Viking invasions than others could at the first of the Anglo-Saxon period. However, it would be unwise to extrapolate this trend and empathise it as some mannikin of onward motion towards the eventual unification of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms unde r the west Saxons. It became harder to translate overlordship into political amalgamation as kingdoms grew, and overlordship was not itself stable, given the internal vicissitudes of kingdoms.We see that, earlier the later ninth and tenth centuries, no kingdom could sustain overlordship for long and, in the absence seizure of accepted institutions of overlordship, this meant that whatever progress tycoon conceivably stimulate been do towards unification under one overlord was mixed-up when his kingdoms power waned. The rise of Wessex was predicated upon factors that for the most part could not have been foreseen it was able to take value of the impuissance of the other incline kingdoms in the wind up of the Viking attacks and could elbow grease the latent sense of religious unity, which was probably make stronger by the common, external, heathen threat.Bassetts all-encompassing fable of a steady football game competition, which ineluctably produces a single winner, is not in particular pertinent while we expertness present metamorphose Kembles 19th century allusions (he exposit overlordship as a mere displace favorable position such as we may find in Hawaii, Tahiti or untested Zealand, ascribable to success in war and lost(p) in turn by defeat35), his elementary conclusion, that the overlordships that we see in the pre-Viking Anglo-Saxon kingdoms were not leading inexorably towards unification, still seems entirely reasonable.BibliographySourcesAdomnan, bread and butter of Columba, ed. and trans. R. Sharpe (1995)Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, in side historic Documents, i, 1, ed. and trans. D. Whitelock (1955)Beowulf, trans. S. Heaney (1999)Bede, ecclesiastic chronicle, ed. and trans. B. Colgrave and R.A.B. Mynors (1969)Bede, earn to Egbert, in incline historic Documents, i, 170, ed. and trans. D. Whitelock (1955)Eddius, bearing of St Wilfred, in incline historic Documents, i, 154, ed. and trans. D. Whitelock (1955)Simeon of Durham , Historia Regum, in side historic Documents, i, 3, ed. and trans. D. Whitelock (1955)Charters in side diachronic Documents, i, 54, 66-7, 76-7, 79-80, 85-7 garner in position historic Documents, i, one hundred sixty-five-6, 177-9, 191-3, 195, 197-200, 202, 204-5, 208-10, ed. and trans. D. Whitelock (1955) collateral kit and caboodleS. Bassett (ed.), The Origins of the Anglo-Saxon solid grounds (1989)M.P. chocolate-brown and C.A. Farr (eds.), Mercia An Anglo-Saxon Kingdom in atomic number 63 (2001)J. Campbell, Bedes Reges and Principes (Jarrow chit-chat 1979), in J. Campbell, Essays in Anglo-Saxon chronicle (1986)J. Campbell (ed.), The Anglo-Saxons (1982)J. Campbell, The advert of the Sutton Hoo discovery on the bring of Anglo-Saxon History, in J. Campbell, The Anglo-Saxon State (2000)W. Davies and H. Vierck, The Contexts of the tribal Hidage kindly Aggregates and colony purposes, in Frhmittelalterliche Studien 8 (1974)D.N. Dumville, The Aetheling a study in Anglo-Saxon implicit in(p) History, in Anglo-Saxon England 8 (1979)D.N. Dumville, The linguistic process of Overkingship in previous(predicate) Anglo-Saxon England, in The Anglo-Saxons from the Migration issue to the 8th nose candy An ethnographical opinion, ed. J. Hines (1997)N.J. Higham, An incline imperium Bede and the early Anglo-Saxon kings (1995)D. Hill, Offas decametre Pattern and Purpose, in Antiquaries daybook 80 (2000)E. John, Orbis Britanniae and the Anglo-Saxon Kings, in E. John, Orbis Britanniae (1966)J.M. Kemble, The Saxons in England, ed. and revise W. De G. slash (1876)S. Keynes, Raedwald the Bretwalda, in ocean trip to the new(prenominal) humanity the bequest of Sutton Hoo, ed. C.B. Kendall and P.S. surface (1992)S. Keynes, England 700-900, in The juvenile Cambridge medieval History II, c.700-c.900, ed. R. McKitterick (1995)D.P. Kirby, The devising of aboriginal England (1967)D.P. Kirby, The early slope Kings (1991)J.N.L. Myres, Anglo-Saxon clayware and t he block of England (1969)P.H. Sawyer, From papist Britain to Norman England (1998)F.M. Stenton, The mastery of the Mercian Kings (1918), in F.M. Stenton, preparatory to Anglo-Saxon England (1970)F.M. Stenton, Anglo-Saxon England (1971)A. Williams, Kingship and political science in Pre-Conquest England c.500-1066 (1999)P. Wormald, Bede, the Bretwaldas and the Origins of the name Anglorum, in ensample and macrocosm in Frankish and Anglo-Saxon community Studies presented to J.M. Wallace-Hadrill, ed. P. Wormald et al. (1983)P. Wormald, The Venerable Bede and the Church of the incline, The side apparitional customs and the sense experience of Anglicanism, ed. G. Rowell (1992)B. Yorke, Kings and Kingdoms of primordial Anglo-Saxon England (1990)1 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 8652 Bede, ecclesiastical History, ii, 53 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 485, 491, 568, 577, 5844 Bede, ecclesiastic History, i, 25 ii, 3 ii, 55 Bede, ecclesiastic History, i, 326 Bede, ecclesiastical History, ii, 5 ii , 97 Bede, ecclesiastical History, ii, 9 iii, 78 Bede, ecclesiastic History, ii, 149 Bede, ecclesiastic History, ii, 1610 Bede, ecclesiastic History, v, 2311 Bede, ecclesiastic History, iii, 3012 Eddius, life of St Wilfred, 2013 incline historical Documents, i, 6714 position historic Documents, i, 7615 side of meat diachronic Documents, i, 7716 position historic Documents, i, 8017 incline historical Documents, i, 8518 English diachronic Documents, i, 8719 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 82920 Bede, ecclesiastic History, ii, 5 iii, 2421 Eddius, emotional state of St Wilfred, 2022 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 82923 Kirby, The fashioning of proterozoic England, p 5424 Adomnan, behavior of Columba, i, 125 English diachronic Documents, i, 17726 English diachronic Documents, i, 17827 English historic Documents, i, 191, 198, 21028 English diachronic Documents, i, 204, 20529 Beowulf, lines 72-330 Bede, letter to Egbert31 English historic Documents, i, 16532 Dumville, The aethelin g a study in Anglo-Saxon implicit in(p) history, p 1333 Simeon of Durham, Historia Regum, in English historical Documents, i, 334 English diachronic Documents, i, 20235 Kemble, The Saxons in England, mess ii, p 17